Question 1
Animal ordinances in Bryan are currently enforced through warrantless home inspections and searches, jeopardizing pet owners' rights. College Station is in the process of adopting a new set of animal control ordinances that are more respectful of rights to privacy. Do you support similar revisions of the City's animal control ordinances in Bryan?
Yes. While I believe warming on a global scale may one day be proven to be a miscalculation, I do believe in many of the ideas outlined in the Cool Cities program. Water and trees heat and cool more slowly than asphalt and brick due to difference in conductivity. Water and trees will be slower to heat up during the day, making it more cool in the afternoon. The trade off is that the temperature is a little warmer at night as it takes the water and trees longer to cool down. If you ever spent the afternoon in a parking lot on a hot day as it heats up more than the surrounding areas, you can appreciate the fact that we need to include more trees and water in the landscape.
Question 2
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in College Station, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
No. The word “all places” is one that I can’t get behind. For example, plans for a sidewalk on Northgate would eliminate more of the already severely limited parking at the Methodist Church. I applaud the city’s recent effort in creating bike lanes and crosswalks. The trails around Wolf Pen Creek, and the Wide bike lanes along Texas Avenue are good examples of what I would like to see more of. Encouraging pedestrian travel reduces vehicle emissions, reduces traffic, and promotes exercise. Let’s continue to make progress toward these goals without creating undue hardships on the churches and businesses.
Question 3
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but there is still a great deal of recyclable material going into our landfill. Do you believe the city should be promoting further actions to reduce waste and encourage reuse and recycling?
Yes. Most residents simply don’t know, or forget, that there is curbside recycling in the city. I can recall only one time that I have seen a bag by my street other than my own in the last 4 years. To raise awareness, I would like to propose that we have a small roll of recycle bags with instructions dropped next to every trash can, at least once a year.
Question 4
Farmers’ Markets can reduce transportation impacts of food, support local farmers, create community connection, increase the viability of surrounding businesses, and project our community character. Do you support funding for a permanent farmer’s market in a visible, central location?
No. I absolutely believe in local agriculture. When the nation relies on agriculture from a only a few locations, we are all vulnerable to the same shortages due to crop diseases, drought, and pests. Local agriculture encourages the growth of native plants which are easier on the soil, require far less fertilizers, require less pesticide, support the local economy, and require less fossil fuel to ship.
I don’t believe that running a business, or supporting a business, is a legitimate function of government. I do believe that a financial incentive, such as a low property tax assessment for the first few years, could be a good tool to encourage the development of a farmers market.
Question 5
Our community is sprawling to the south while more than 40% of the developable land within the city limits remains undeveloped. Urban sprawl drives up tax rates by increasing the cost of infrastructure and community services such as police, fire and ambulances. It also diminishes aesthetic appeal and increases traffic. Many cities have recognized the advantages of “Smart Growth” and taken measures to curb sprawl. Do you believe the city should take a proactive role in addressing this issue?
Yes. I would like to see more money spent on the older areas of College Station that are in bad need of repair. In Austin, Hyde Park is about the same distance from the university as South Gate is to Texas A&M. The lots are about the same size, and Hyde Park is prime real estate. Instead of letting South Gate get run down, we might buy a couple of lots for use as a park or attraction. With some new roads and development, investors might have incentive to build new houses on old lots and clean up the area instead of building on the outskirts of town and facilitating urban sprawl.
Question 6
While we recognize that City Hall needs to be expanded, the citizens of College Station voted last May against rebuilding at a site on Kranek Tap Road. Expansion at the current location could meet the city’s needs while also taking a positive step toward increasing building density in College Station, thereby decreasing the pressure for sprawl. Do you support the expansion of City Hall at its present location?
Yes. I voted with 66% of residents against building a new City Hall on Krenek Tap Road.
Question 7
T The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 8
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet Bryan has encouraged large retail development by national chains with financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
Yes. Preserving and encouraging the growth of local small businesses in College Station is more important than encouraging large retail development. Small businesses never become “too big to fail”. Business owners see immediate results of their decisions and are able to tailor their businesses to meet local customer demand. Diversity among businesses also helps to ensure that if a business fails we can easily adapt. I would discourage financial incentives that would give national chains an unfair advantage against local business.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Candidates: McIlhaney Answers Progressive Questions
Question 1
In 2008, College Station signed the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program. In doing so, we pledged that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you agree with our commitment to become a Cool City? If no, please elaborate. If yes, what further actions do you propose to continue our progress towards meeting our Cool Cities Commitment?
The city is in the process of looking for a staff person to co-ordinate the Green City program. We are looking at using hybrid cars where applicable, energy efficient buildings as we have capital projects, improving our hike and bike trails, recycling programs, a street tree planting program, water conservation, our commitment to the wind watts program, continued support of our parkland dedication program, and our hazardous waste collection program resulting in the safe disposal of over 200,000 pounds of electronic and hazardous materials.
Question 2
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in College Station, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
We are addressing the connectivity through our transportation plan as part of the new Comprehensive Plan and our Greenways Plan. We are putting an emphasis on multi-modal transportation for pedestrians, bikers, public transit, etc. In our bond packages, we are including programs to improve and build projects. We are working with our TX-DOT partners to address pedestrian traffic and bike lanes on our state roadways.
Question 3
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but there is still a great deal of recyclable material going into our landfill. Do you believe the city should be promoting further actions to reduce waste and encourage reuse and recycling?
Our staff is currently working to identify additional programs that can be implemented to encourage recycling. We have tried apartment recycling in the past, without much success, so we want to make sure that any additional programs can be cost effective and achieve our stated goals of reducing waste to the landfill.
Question 4
Farmers’ Markets can reduce transportation impacts of food, support local farmers, create community connection, increase the viability of surrounding businesses, and project our community character. Do you support funding for a permanent farmer’s market in a visible, central location?
I support a local Farmer’s Market and am willing to look at locations that city owns that we can work with the private sector and local farmers, but I do not support tax payers buying land, building a building, etc to do so. I think a public/private partnership would be worth exploring, along with creating a community garden.
Question 5
Our community is sprawling to the south while more than 40% of the developable land within the city limits remains undeveloped. Urban sprawl drives up tax rates by increasing the cost of infrastructure and community services such as police, fire and ambulances. It also diminishes aesthetic appeal and increases traffic. Many cities have recognized the advantages of “Smart Growth” and taken measures to curb sprawl. Do you believe the city should take a proactive role in addressing this issue?
As we review existing ordinances, we should do so in light of encouraging re-development within the existing city limits, in-fill development, zoning, building standards and pedestrian friendly infrastructure. Creating a sense of place, attention to character of area being developed or re-developed, and looking at options for developers so they can offer those development opportunities.
Question 6
While we recognize that City Hall needs to be expanded, the citizens of College Station voted last May against rebuilding at a site on Kranek Tap Road. Expansion at the current location could meet the city’s needs while also taking a positive step toward increasing building density in College Station, thereby decreasing the pressure for sprawl. Do you support the expansion of City Hall at its present location?
Let me state that in the short term, we will have to look at options regarding some expansion at the existing site or rent spaces elsewhere for some staff; however, this is not the best course for the long term. The council began looking at space needs, efficient service delivery, a more central location that is pedestrian and bike friendly, land that is not as valuable for tax purposes. Krenek Tap was chosen since we already have several city departments located there, it is more central, the land value is less and it provides a more efficient use of staff time, and service delivery. The current site has already been through several expansions and still does not address the fact that fuel and time of staff are being spent driving to and from the different locations to do their daily jobs. It does not give us the space needed for future growth, it is not centrally located for our citizens and the cost to re-locate rather than renovate is a better investment for our citizens in the long term.
Question 7
The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 8
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet College Station has encouraged large retail development by national chains by giving out financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
I support a policy that clearly states we do not offer incentives for retail development. I do think there should be a level playing field. The local, independent businesses should work with our Economic Development office to identify issues that might need to be addressed by a change or adoption of an ordinance, whether for new development or re-development purposes.
In 2008, College Station signed the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program. In doing so, we pledged that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you agree with our commitment to become a Cool City? If no, please elaborate. If yes, what further actions do you propose to continue our progress towards meeting our Cool Cities Commitment?
The city is in the process of looking for a staff person to co-ordinate the Green City program. We are looking at using hybrid cars where applicable, energy efficient buildings as we have capital projects, improving our hike and bike trails, recycling programs, a street tree planting program, water conservation, our commitment to the wind watts program, continued support of our parkland dedication program, and our hazardous waste collection program resulting in the safe disposal of over 200,000 pounds of electronic and hazardous materials.
Question 2
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in College Station, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
We are addressing the connectivity through our transportation plan as part of the new Comprehensive Plan and our Greenways Plan. We are putting an emphasis on multi-modal transportation for pedestrians, bikers, public transit, etc. In our bond packages, we are including programs to improve and build projects. We are working with our TX-DOT partners to address pedestrian traffic and bike lanes on our state roadways.
Question 3
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but there is still a great deal of recyclable material going into our landfill. Do you believe the city should be promoting further actions to reduce waste and encourage reuse and recycling?
Our staff is currently working to identify additional programs that can be implemented to encourage recycling. We have tried apartment recycling in the past, without much success, so we want to make sure that any additional programs can be cost effective and achieve our stated goals of reducing waste to the landfill.
Question 4
Farmers’ Markets can reduce transportation impacts of food, support local farmers, create community connection, increase the viability of surrounding businesses, and project our community character. Do you support funding for a permanent farmer’s market in a visible, central location?
I support a local Farmer’s Market and am willing to look at locations that city owns that we can work with the private sector and local farmers, but I do not support tax payers buying land, building a building, etc to do so. I think a public/private partnership would be worth exploring, along with creating a community garden.
Question 5
Our community is sprawling to the south while more than 40% of the developable land within the city limits remains undeveloped. Urban sprawl drives up tax rates by increasing the cost of infrastructure and community services such as police, fire and ambulances. It also diminishes aesthetic appeal and increases traffic. Many cities have recognized the advantages of “Smart Growth” and taken measures to curb sprawl. Do you believe the city should take a proactive role in addressing this issue?
As we review existing ordinances, we should do so in light of encouraging re-development within the existing city limits, in-fill development, zoning, building standards and pedestrian friendly infrastructure. Creating a sense of place, attention to character of area being developed or re-developed, and looking at options for developers so they can offer those development opportunities.
Question 6
While we recognize that City Hall needs to be expanded, the citizens of College Station voted last May against rebuilding at a site on Kranek Tap Road. Expansion at the current location could meet the city’s needs while also taking a positive step toward increasing building density in College Station, thereby decreasing the pressure for sprawl. Do you support the expansion of City Hall at its present location?
Let me state that in the short term, we will have to look at options regarding some expansion at the existing site or rent spaces elsewhere for some staff; however, this is not the best course for the long term. The council began looking at space needs, efficient service delivery, a more central location that is pedestrian and bike friendly, land that is not as valuable for tax purposes. Krenek Tap was chosen since we already have several city departments located there, it is more central, the land value is less and it provides a more efficient use of staff time, and service delivery. The current site has already been through several expansions and still does not address the fact that fuel and time of staff are being spent driving to and from the different locations to do their daily jobs. It does not give us the space needed for future growth, it is not centrally located for our citizens and the cost to re-locate rather than renovate is a better investment for our citizens in the long term.
Question 7
The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 8
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet College Station has encouraged large retail development by national chains by giving out financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
I support a policy that clearly states we do not offer incentives for retail development. I do think there should be a level playing field. The local, independent businesses should work with our Economic Development office to identify issues that might need to be addressed by a change or adoption of an ordinance, whether for new development or re-development purposes.
Candidates: Lyles Answers Progressive Questions
Question 1
In 2008, College Station signed the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program. In doing so, we pledged that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you agree with our commitment to become a Cool City? If no, please elaborate. If yes, what further actions do you propose to continue our progress towards meeting our Cool Cities Commitment?
No Comment Submitted
Question 2
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in College Station, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
No Comment Submitted
Question 3
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but there is still a great deal of recyclable material going into our landfill. Do you believe the city should be promoting further actions to reduce waste and encourage reuse and recycling?
No Comment Submitted
Question 4
Farmers’ Markets can reduce transportation impacts of food, support local farmers, create community connection, increase the viability of surrounding businesses, and project our community character. Do you support funding for a permanent farmer’s market in a visible, central location?
No Comment Submitted
Question 5
Our community is sprawling to the south while more than 40% of the developable land within the city limits remains undeveloped. Urban sprawl drives up tax rates by increasing the cost of infrastructure and community services such as police, fire and ambulances. It also diminishes aesthetic appeal and increases traffic. Many cities have recognized the advantages of “Smart Growth” and taken measures to curb sprawl. Do you believe the city should take a proactive role in addressing this issue?
No Comment Submitted
Question 6
While we recognize that City Hall needs to be expanded, the citizens of College Station voted last May against rebuilding at a site on Kranek Tap Road. Expansion at the current location could meet the city’s needs while also taking a positive step toward increasing building density in College Station, thereby decreasing the pressure for sprawl. Do you support the expansion of City Hall at its present location?
No Comment Submitted
Question 7
The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Do you agree?
No Comment Submitted
Question 8
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet College Station has encouraged large retail development by national chains by giving out financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
No Comment Submitted
In 2008, College Station signed the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program. In doing so, we pledged that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you agree with our commitment to become a Cool City? If no, please elaborate. If yes, what further actions do you propose to continue our progress towards meeting our Cool Cities Commitment?
No Comment Submitted
Question 2
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in College Station, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
No Comment Submitted
Question 3
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but there is still a great deal of recyclable material going into our landfill. Do you believe the city should be promoting further actions to reduce waste and encourage reuse and recycling?
No Comment Submitted
Question 4
Farmers’ Markets can reduce transportation impacts of food, support local farmers, create community connection, increase the viability of surrounding businesses, and project our community character. Do you support funding for a permanent farmer’s market in a visible, central location?
No Comment Submitted
Question 5
Our community is sprawling to the south while more than 40% of the developable land within the city limits remains undeveloped. Urban sprawl drives up tax rates by increasing the cost of infrastructure and community services such as police, fire and ambulances. It also diminishes aesthetic appeal and increases traffic. Many cities have recognized the advantages of “Smart Growth” and taken measures to curb sprawl. Do you believe the city should take a proactive role in addressing this issue?
No Comment Submitted
Question 6
While we recognize that City Hall needs to be expanded, the citizens of College Station voted last May against rebuilding at a site on Kranek Tap Road. Expansion at the current location could meet the city’s needs while also taking a positive step toward increasing building density in College Station, thereby decreasing the pressure for sprawl. Do you support the expansion of City Hall at its present location?
No Comment Submitted
Question 7
The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Do you agree?
No Comment Submitted
Question 8
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet College Station has encouraged large retail development by national chains by giving out financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
No Comment Submitted
Candidates: Cummings Answers Progressive Questions
Question 1
In 2008, College Station signed the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program. In doing so, we pledged that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you agree with our commitment to become a Cool City? If no, please elaborate. If yes, what further actions do you propose to continue our progress towards meeting our Cool Cities Commitment?
No Comment Submitted
Question 2
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in College Station, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
No Comment Submitted
Question 3
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but there is still a great deal of recyclable material going into our landfill. Do you believe the city should be promoting further actions to reduce waste and encourage reuse and recycling?
No Comment Submitted
Question 4
Farmers’ Markets can reduce transportation impacts of food, support local farmers, create community connection, increase the viability of surrounding businesses, and project our community character. Do you support funding for a permanent farmer’s market in a visible, central location?
Yes. Location is the question here. A central public square would be ideal for a weekend market, but lacking that, it would have to be in a central location, accessible to autos, cyclists, pedestrians, etc. I like the idea, and am open to suggestions.
Question 5
Our community is sprawling to the south while more than 40% of the developable land within the city limits remains undeveloped. Urban sprawl drives up tax rates by increasing the cost of infrastructure and community services such as police, fire and ambulances. It also diminishes aesthetic appeal and increases traffic. Many cities have recognized the advantages of “Smart Growth” and taken measures to curb sprawl. Do you believe the city should take a proactive role in addressing this issue?
Yes. Primarily, I would try to create incentives to redevelop areas within the city more densely, through temporary tax breaks, and if applicable, green building credits, as well as removing some of the barriers preventing development. I would also like to see pressure put on land owners who allow their properties to sit vacant, unutilized, or underutilized to develop them or sell them to interests that would rather than sitting on them for years while the city grows unsustainably.
Question 6
While we recognize that City Hall needs to be expanded, the citizens of College Station voted last May against rebuilding at a site on Kranek Tap Road. Expansion at the current location could meet the city’s needs while also taking a positive step toward increasing building density in College Station, thereby decreasing the pressure for sprawl. Do you support the expansion of City Hall at its present location?
Yes and no. There is some logic in having the city offices located alongside the other municipal services, and I do support the move. There would have to be a responsible plan for use of the current property once the offices are relocated, however. Whether that be selling it to offset the costs of the move, or allocating it for something such as a farmers’ market, as in question 4 would need to be resolved before I could fully support the move.
Question 7
The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 8
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet College Station has encouraged large retail development by national chains by giving out financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
Yes. I like the idea of limiting the size of retail outlets, but something about it just feels wrong to me. However, creating restrictions on street setbacks for retail outlets that effectively eliminate mega sized parking lots and the chains that require them can achieve similar results. Santa Fe, NM has enacted something along these lines, I believe.
In 2008, College Station signed the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program. In doing so, we pledged that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you agree with our commitment to become a Cool City? If no, please elaborate. If yes, what further actions do you propose to continue our progress towards meeting our Cool Cities Commitment?
No Comment Submitted
Question 2
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in College Station, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
No Comment Submitted
Question 3
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but there is still a great deal of recyclable material going into our landfill. Do you believe the city should be promoting further actions to reduce waste and encourage reuse and recycling?
No Comment Submitted
Question 4
Farmers’ Markets can reduce transportation impacts of food, support local farmers, create community connection, increase the viability of surrounding businesses, and project our community character. Do you support funding for a permanent farmer’s market in a visible, central location?
Yes. Location is the question here. A central public square would be ideal for a weekend market, but lacking that, it would have to be in a central location, accessible to autos, cyclists, pedestrians, etc. I like the idea, and am open to suggestions.
Question 5
Our community is sprawling to the south while more than 40% of the developable land within the city limits remains undeveloped. Urban sprawl drives up tax rates by increasing the cost of infrastructure and community services such as police, fire and ambulances. It also diminishes aesthetic appeal and increases traffic. Many cities have recognized the advantages of “Smart Growth” and taken measures to curb sprawl. Do you believe the city should take a proactive role in addressing this issue?
Yes. Primarily, I would try to create incentives to redevelop areas within the city more densely, through temporary tax breaks, and if applicable, green building credits, as well as removing some of the barriers preventing development. I would also like to see pressure put on land owners who allow their properties to sit vacant, unutilized, or underutilized to develop them or sell them to interests that would rather than sitting on them for years while the city grows unsustainably.
Question 6
While we recognize that City Hall needs to be expanded, the citizens of College Station voted last May against rebuilding at a site on Kranek Tap Road. Expansion at the current location could meet the city’s needs while also taking a positive step toward increasing building density in College Station, thereby decreasing the pressure for sprawl. Do you support the expansion of City Hall at its present location?
Yes and no. There is some logic in having the city offices located alongside the other municipal services, and I do support the move. There would have to be a responsible plan for use of the current property once the offices are relocated, however. Whether that be selling it to offset the costs of the move, or allocating it for something such as a farmers’ market, as in question 4 would need to be resolved before I could fully support the move.
Question 7
The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 8
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet College Station has encouraged large retail development by national chains by giving out financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
Yes. I like the idea of limiting the size of retail outlets, but something about it just feels wrong to me. However, creating restrictions on street setbacks for retail outlets that effectively eliminate mega sized parking lots and the chains that require them can achieve similar results. Santa Fe, NM has enacted something along these lines, I believe.
Monday, May 4, 2009
Candidates: Hughes Answers Progressive Questions
Question 1
Animal ordinances in Bryan are currently enforced through warrantless home inspections and searches, jeopardizing pet owners' rights. College Station is in the process of adopting a new set of animal control ordinances that are more respectful of rights to privacy. Do you support similar revisions of the City's animal control ordinances in Bryan?
No. I am not aware of the unjust practices against "pets" and pet owners. I do support the rights of individuals, per owners and non-pet owners, but we all have responsibilities that go along with our rights. Those responsibilities include making sure the exercising of our rights do not infringe on the rights of others.
Question 2
Bryan has taken some tangible steps that have the effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including the redevelopment of downtown, which reduces sprawl, and BTU's buy back program for the excess energy from solar panels on private homes. College Station signed the U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program pledging that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you believe that Bryan should sign on to become a Cool City?
No. I am not familiar with the specifics of the Cool City program, but I do believe that we all should work to take care of our environment which includes clean air, clean water, sanitary conditions, conservation, safety, etc. The global warming issue is an ongoing debate at this point, and I would be cautious in making demands on citizens, or spending their tax dollars, based solely on what we presently know about global warming.
Question 3
Requiring approval of three members to place an item on the City Council agenda would appear to violate the spirit of single member districts. If minority positions are excluded from the agenda, they are in essence silenced. Do you support the resolution to revert back to requiring agreement from only two council members for an item to be placed on the agenda?
Yes. I am not aware of any real problems with the present procedure and/or requirements for placing an item on the agenda, but since this has garnered enough Citizen support to put this on the ballot to change the City Charter, I respect what the majority of the voters decide and agree to support their decision. I respect the members of Council, and believe that each one has the best intentions when bringing an item before the Council.
Question 4
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in Bryan, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
Yes. This is a personal responsibility issue also. Accessibility is important for all citizens. As a nation, state and city, we have made tremendous strides in improving the accessibility for our citizens with mobility handicaps. We should continue to make all public areas and buildings accessible when possible. Personal residences should not fall under the same requirements as public areas. Private residences are personal property and accessibility should be at the discretion of the home owner. As a city, we should strive to improve the connectivity in Bryan for all residents. We should also strive to make these routes safer for all through education on the proper use of bike lanes and pedestrian crossings. Traffic laws should be strictly enforced because the violations of these laws many times results in costly repairs, injury, or loss of life. Stricter laws should be implemented for bicycles and pedestrians also, rather than placing all the burden on drivers of motor vehicles. We all win when we take more responsibility for our actions.
Question 5
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but Bryan still offers only an under-used drop-off site. Do you believe that Bryan should be promoting further actions to encourage reuse and recycling, thereby reducing the amount of waste entering our landfill?
No. I would have to be shown this is a reasonable use of taxpayer dollars. You don't encourage responsible behavior by making it easier to do the right thing; you encourage responsible behavior through educating the citizens about the benefits of conservation and how it is our responsibility, as citizens, to do our part to make our city the best it can be.
Question 6
T The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 7
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet Bryan has encouraged large retail development by national chains with financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
No. I believe that local businesses are the backbone of any community. I also believe that the large national retailers are beneficial to the local economy in many cases. There are instances where it is prudent to offer incentives to large retail center developers who buy the property, build the buildings, and lease space to national retailers and/or businesses to locate in our area to spur the growth of our community. In most cases, the incentives are for the developers who take the risk in developing new centers, business parks, industrial parks, etc, not for the businesses they attract to the area. The City Government should exercise wisdom and vision when considering incentives for any specific business. If it is a new industry or new type business that is not presently represented in our City, the incentives could be very beneficial to the community by bringing in these new businesses. Where we should be very careful and prudent, is when we are considering bringing in a business that is a direct competitor to existing local business, and does not offer any significant advantage to the local economy beyond what the local businesses do. On the other hand, local businesses that have enjoyed years of success in our area cannot fall into the trap of thinking that people should shop with them because they have been here for 20 years. Local businesses must stay on the cutting edge and learn to compete in the larger, expanding arena. The local merchant can offer something that the national retail store cannot…Service. The local merchant cannot compete on price, but many, many people value quality, personal service by someone who is friendly and knowledgeable about the products, or services, they are selling. Competition is a good thing for the community, and a good thing for the local merchants that embrace it and use it to improve their own products or services. Local businesses have the ability to promote themselves, they do not need the City to do it. The City, on the other hand, should not do anything that would give the national retailers an advantage over the local businesses.
Animal ordinances in Bryan are currently enforced through warrantless home inspections and searches, jeopardizing pet owners' rights. College Station is in the process of adopting a new set of animal control ordinances that are more respectful of rights to privacy. Do you support similar revisions of the City's animal control ordinances in Bryan?
No. I am not aware of the unjust practices against "pets" and pet owners. I do support the rights of individuals, per owners and non-pet owners, but we all have responsibilities that go along with our rights. Those responsibilities include making sure the exercising of our rights do not infringe on the rights of others.
Question 2
Bryan has taken some tangible steps that have the effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including the redevelopment of downtown, which reduces sprawl, and BTU's buy back program for the excess energy from solar panels on private homes. College Station signed the U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program pledging that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you believe that Bryan should sign on to become a Cool City?
No. I am not familiar with the specifics of the Cool City program, but I do believe that we all should work to take care of our environment which includes clean air, clean water, sanitary conditions, conservation, safety, etc. The global warming issue is an ongoing debate at this point, and I would be cautious in making demands on citizens, or spending their tax dollars, based solely on what we presently know about global warming.
Question 3
Requiring approval of three members to place an item on the City Council agenda would appear to violate the spirit of single member districts. If minority positions are excluded from the agenda, they are in essence silenced. Do you support the resolution to revert back to requiring agreement from only two council members for an item to be placed on the agenda?
Yes. I am not aware of any real problems with the present procedure and/or requirements for placing an item on the agenda, but since this has garnered enough Citizen support to put this on the ballot to change the City Charter, I respect what the majority of the voters decide and agree to support their decision. I respect the members of Council, and believe that each one has the best intentions when bringing an item before the Council.
Question 4
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in Bryan, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
Yes. This is a personal responsibility issue also. Accessibility is important for all citizens. As a nation, state and city, we have made tremendous strides in improving the accessibility for our citizens with mobility handicaps. We should continue to make all public areas and buildings accessible when possible. Personal residences should not fall under the same requirements as public areas. Private residences are personal property and accessibility should be at the discretion of the home owner. As a city, we should strive to improve the connectivity in Bryan for all residents. We should also strive to make these routes safer for all through education on the proper use of bike lanes and pedestrian crossings. Traffic laws should be strictly enforced because the violations of these laws many times results in costly repairs, injury, or loss of life. Stricter laws should be implemented for bicycles and pedestrians also, rather than placing all the burden on drivers of motor vehicles. We all win when we take more responsibility for our actions.
Question 5
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but Bryan still offers only an under-used drop-off site. Do you believe that Bryan should be promoting further actions to encourage reuse and recycling, thereby reducing the amount of waste entering our landfill?
No. I would have to be shown this is a reasonable use of taxpayer dollars. You don't encourage responsible behavior by making it easier to do the right thing; you encourage responsible behavior through educating the citizens about the benefits of conservation and how it is our responsibility, as citizens, to do our part to make our city the best it can be.
Question 6
T The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 7
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet Bryan has encouraged large retail development by national chains with financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
No. I believe that local businesses are the backbone of any community. I also believe that the large national retailers are beneficial to the local economy in many cases. There are instances where it is prudent to offer incentives to large retail center developers who buy the property, build the buildings, and lease space to national retailers and/or businesses to locate in our area to spur the growth of our community. In most cases, the incentives are for the developers who take the risk in developing new centers, business parks, industrial parks, etc, not for the businesses they attract to the area. The City Government should exercise wisdom and vision when considering incentives for any specific business. If it is a new industry or new type business that is not presently represented in our City, the incentives could be very beneficial to the community by bringing in these new businesses. Where we should be very careful and prudent, is when we are considering bringing in a business that is a direct competitor to existing local business, and does not offer any significant advantage to the local economy beyond what the local businesses do. On the other hand, local businesses that have enjoyed years of success in our area cannot fall into the trap of thinking that people should shop with them because they have been here for 20 years. Local businesses must stay on the cutting edge and learn to compete in the larger, expanding arena. The local merchant can offer something that the national retail store cannot…Service. The local merchant cannot compete on price, but many, many people value quality, personal service by someone who is friendly and knowledgeable about the products, or services, they are selling. Competition is a good thing for the community, and a good thing for the local merchants that embrace it and use it to improve their own products or services. Local businesses have the ability to promote themselves, they do not need the City to do it. The City, on the other hand, should not do anything that would give the national retailers an advantage over the local businesses.
Candidates: Southerland Answers Progressive Questions
Question 1
Animal ordinances in Bryan are currently enforced through warrantless home inspections and searches, jeopardizing pet owners' rights. College Station is in the process of adopting a new set of animal control ordinances that are more respectful of rights to privacy. Do you support similar revisions of the City's animal control ordinances in Bryan?
Yes: The City of Bryan is in the final stages of the animal ordinance revision. The new ordinance is very comprehensive and attempts to balance the health and safety of the animal and the citizens with the pet owner rights.
Question 2
Bryan has taken some tangible steps that have the effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including the redevelopment of downtown, which reduces sprawl, and BTU's buy back program for the excess energy from solar panels on private homes. College Station signed the U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program pledging that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you believe that Bryan should sign on to become a Cool City?
I have not seen the "Cool Cities Program". However, the departments of the City of Bryan work very diligently to protect the environment. BTU has proposed a gas generation project that recovers methane gas from the current land fill and produces electricity. Hopefully, it will be on line very soon. The city has a very successful recycling program at the Bryan Wal-Mart. The program operates at very low cost to the tax payers and is highly successful. The staff also works with Keep Brazos Beautiful and other non-profit groups to educate and support "greening" projects.
Question 3
Requiring approval of three members to place an item on the City Council agenda would appear to violate the spirit of single member districts. If minority positions are excluded from the agenda, they are in essence silenced. Do you support the resolution to revert back to requiring agreement from only two council members for an item to be placed on the agenda?
Yes: I led the petition effort to have the city charter changed to add a rule that if two council members request an item be placed on the city agenda it must be done without exception. The petition was signed by over 1700 Bryan Voters. The city rules require at least a public vote of a majority of council members present to take any action. However, currently, the mayor alone has the authority to keep items off the agenda. So many times citizen issues that may not be popular with the mayor or a majority of council members can be defeated without ever being heard at an open meeting and coming to a vote.
With a rule of 2 members being able to place an item on the agenda the city government will be open to the public. This will preclude the mayor and a block of council members from stifling the minority opinion and controlling city actions. The agenda should be open for all to have ideas presented and voted on in an open public meeting by the elected officials.
Question 4
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in Bryan, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
Yes: The capital improvement plan should be used more effectively to solve these issues. The expenditures currently recommended by city staff concentrate too much on the downtown area. The plan should have more balance across all 5 city districts. The city should have a committee composed of citizen representatives from each district to review all city requirements and select the projects that best address the citizen identified needs.
Question 5
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but Bryan still offers only an under-used drop-off site. Do you believe that Bryan should be promoting further actions to encourage reuse and recycling, thereby reducing the amount of waste entering our landfill?
Yes and No: Bryan has a very successful recycling program at the Bryan Wal-Mart. The program operates at very low cost to the tax payers and is highly successful. I understand the curbside collection effort does not produce more volume than the Bryan Wal-Mart located collection center. Also, the volume of collection at a central location can increase without higher costs. Bryan also operates the compost facility for both cities that processes some solid wastes in to useable gardening products and there by reduces the landfill requirements. Any recommendation that can reduce waste is welcome.
Question 6
T The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 7
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet Bryan has encouraged large retail development by national chains with financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
Yes: I work very hard to make sure our local businesses are treated fairly. The city council members are the leaders of the city and must always be vigilant for the citizens and business owners to insure the regulations and incentives are applied equally. I believe our citizens will, if the council will listen, identify the issues, explain how to correct them and help the city overcome them.
Animal ordinances in Bryan are currently enforced through warrantless home inspections and searches, jeopardizing pet owners' rights. College Station is in the process of adopting a new set of animal control ordinances that are more respectful of rights to privacy. Do you support similar revisions of the City's animal control ordinances in Bryan?
Yes: The City of Bryan is in the final stages of the animal ordinance revision. The new ordinance is very comprehensive and attempts to balance the health and safety of the animal and the citizens with the pet owner rights.
Question 2
Bryan has taken some tangible steps that have the effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including the redevelopment of downtown, which reduces sprawl, and BTU's buy back program for the excess energy from solar panels on private homes. College Station signed the U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement to become part of the Cool Cities program pledging that the community and local government will take action to reduce global warming. Do you believe that Bryan should sign on to become a Cool City?
I have not seen the "Cool Cities Program". However, the departments of the City of Bryan work very diligently to protect the environment. BTU has proposed a gas generation project that recovers methane gas from the current land fill and produces electricity. Hopefully, it will be on line very soon. The city has a very successful recycling program at the Bryan Wal-Mart. The program operates at very low cost to the tax payers and is highly successful. The staff also works with Keep Brazos Beautiful and other non-profit groups to educate and support "greening" projects.
Question 3
Requiring approval of three members to place an item on the City Council agenda would appear to violate the spirit of single member districts. If minority positions are excluded from the agenda, they are in essence silenced. Do you support the resolution to revert back to requiring agreement from only two council members for an item to be placed on the agenda?
Yes: I led the petition effort to have the city charter changed to add a rule that if two council members request an item be placed on the city agenda it must be done without exception. The petition was signed by over 1700 Bryan Voters. The city rules require at least a public vote of a majority of council members present to take any action. However, currently, the mayor alone has the authority to keep items off the agenda. So many times citizen issues that may not be popular with the mayor or a majority of council members can be defeated without ever being heard at an open meeting and coming to a vote.
With a rule of 2 members being able to place an item on the agenda the city government will be open to the public. This will preclude the mayor and a block of council members from stifling the minority opinion and controlling city actions. The agenda should be open for all to have ideas presented and voted on in an open public meeting by the elected officials.
Question 4
Do you believe that pedestrians, bicyclists, and wheel chair users should have complete and safe access to all places of residence, commerce and employment within the city? If this is to be achieved, a number of measures would need to be taken to improve connectivity in Bryan, such as creating more dedicated bike lanes and crosswalks and enforcing traffic laws that ensure the safety of these users of our roads.
Yes: The capital improvement plan should be used more effectively to solve these issues. The expenditures currently recommended by city staff concentrate too much on the downtown area. The plan should have more balance across all 5 city districts. The city should have a committee composed of citizen representatives from each district to review all city requirements and select the projects that best address the citizen identified needs.
Question 5
College Station has a successful curbside recycling program in place, but Bryan still offers only an under-used drop-off site. Do you believe that Bryan should be promoting further actions to encourage reuse and recycling, thereby reducing the amount of waste entering our landfill?
Yes and No: Bryan has a very successful recycling program at the Bryan Wal-Mart. The program operates at very low cost to the tax payers and is highly successful. I understand the curbside collection effort does not produce more volume than the Bryan Wal-Mart located collection center. Also, the volume of collection at a central location can increase without higher costs. Bryan also operates the compost facility for both cities that processes some solid wastes in to useable gardening products and there by reduces the landfill requirements. Any recommendation that can reduce waste is welcome.
Question 6
T The first Paragraph of the fourteenth amendment reads:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "
Do you agree?
Yes.
Question 7
Locally owned, independent businesses can provide economic stimulus, develop human resources, reflect community character and encourage tourism. Yet Bryan has encouraged large retail development by national chains with financial incentives, thus creating unfair competition for locally owned businesses. Other communities have taken measures to level the playing field, including stopping the provision of incentives to outside competition and putting restrictions on the size of retail outlets that can be developed. Would you support these or other types of initiatives to promote local, independent businesses?
Yes: I work very hard to make sure our local businesses are treated fairly. The city council members are the leaders of the city and must always be vigilant for the citizens and business owners to insure the regulations and incentives are applied equally. I believe our citizens will, if the council will listen, identify the issues, explain how to correct them and help the city overcome them.
Monday, April 27, 2009
BCS Elections 2009: Candidates on Facebook
Bryan Candidates on Facebook
Neither of the candidates running for Bryan City Council have Facebook groups; both candidates are running unopposed so there is not a significant need for a web site or Facebook group. Three out of the four candidates for the Bryan ISD School Board for District 4 have either Facebook pages or groups; neither of the two candidates for District 7 have Facebook groups.
Candidates for Bryan ISD School Board District 4:
Elect James Edge
Kelli Levey for Bryan School Board
Marilyn Scamardo
College Station Candidates on Facebook
Four out of the six candidates running for College Station City Council have Facebook groups; neither of the incumbents running for reelection have Facebook groups. Also, out of the five candidates running for College Station ISD School Board two of them have Facebook groups.
Candidates for College Station City Council Place 4:
Douglas Cummings for College Station City Council
I support Katy-Marie Lyles for City Council
Candidates for College Station City Council Place 6:
Clifton Eggers for College Station City Council - Place 6
Elect Chandler Salome For College Station City Council Place 6
Candidate for the College Station ISD School Board Place 1:
Elect Paul Dorsett for College Station ISD Board of Trustees Place 1
Candidate for the College Station ISD School Board Place 2:
Elect Carol Barrett for College Station School Board Place 2
Neither of the candidates running for Bryan City Council have Facebook groups; both candidates are running unopposed so there is not a significant need for a web site or Facebook group. Three out of the four candidates for the Bryan ISD School Board for District 4 have either Facebook pages or groups; neither of the two candidates for District 7 have Facebook groups.
Candidates for Bryan ISD School Board District 4:
Elect James Edge
Kelli Levey for Bryan School Board
Marilyn Scamardo
College Station Candidates on Facebook
Four out of the six candidates running for College Station City Council have Facebook groups; neither of the incumbents running for reelection have Facebook groups. Also, out of the five candidates running for College Station ISD School Board two of them have Facebook groups.
Candidates for College Station City Council Place 4:
Douglas Cummings for College Station City Council
I support Katy-Marie Lyles for City Council
Candidates for College Station City Council Place 6:
Clifton Eggers for College Station City Council - Place 6
Elect Chandler Salome For College Station City Council Place 6
Candidate for the College Station ISD School Board Place 1:
Elect Paul Dorsett for College Station ISD Board of Trustees Place 1
Candidate for the College Station ISD School Board Place 2:
Elect Carol Barrett for College Station School Board Place 2
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
